🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."