🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I traditionally shied away from significant use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying adventures. My preference was for narrative flow and session development to be shaped by character actions rather than random chance. That said, I opted to try something different, and I'm incredibly glad I did.

The Catalyst: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known streamed game features a DM who frequently requests "fate rolls" from the participants. The process entails picking a specific dice and outlining possible results tied to the result. It's essentially no different from consulting a pre-generated chart, these get invented in the moment when a course of events doesn't have a obvious resolution.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own table, mainly because it seemed interesting and provided a break from my normal practice. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to reflect on the perennial tension between pre-determination and improvisation in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my party had survived a massive fight. Later, a cleric character wondered if two key NPCs—a pair—had lived. Rather than choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both were killed; a middling roll, only one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This led to a deeply emotional moment where the characters came upon the bodies of their friends, forever clasped together in death. The party conducted last rites, which was especially significant due to prior character interactions. As a final gesture, I decided that the remains were strangely transformed, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. By chance, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group needed to solve another major quest obstacle. One just script this type of serendipitous story beats.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This event led me to ponder if randomization and making it up are actually the beating heart of this game. While you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Adventurers frequently excel at ignoring the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to pivot effectively and invent content on the fly.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to practice these talents without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The trick is to apply them for low-stakes situations that don't fundamentally change the session's primary direction. For instance, I wouldn't use it to decide if the king's advisor is a traitor. But, I might use it to determine whether the party reach a location moments before a key action occurs.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Spontaneous randomization also helps keep players engaged and cultivate the impression that the adventure is alive, shaping based on their actions as they play. It reduces the feeling that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned script, thereby enhancing the cooperative nature of storytelling.

Randomization has always been part of the core of D&D. Early editions were filled with charts, which suited a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Even though contemporary D&D tends to emphasizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the only path.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly nothing wrong with being prepared. But, there is also nothing wrong with relinquishing control and allowing the whim of chance to guide minor details rather than you. Direction is a big factor in a DM's job. We need it to run the game, yet we often struggle to give some up, in situations where doing so might improve the game.

My final advice is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Embrace a little chance for smaller outcomes. You might just create that the unexpected outcome is far more rewarding than anything you could have scripted by yourself.